The
American justice and sentencing system is considered one of the worst in the
world mainly because of the manner through which there is more of a focus on incarceration
over other forms of correction as a means of achieving rehabilitation.
Individuals in the United States tend to be disproportionately incarcerated
with the result being that a considerable number of these not only fail to get
reformed, but there is an increase in the levels of recidivism. It has
therefore become necessary to make sure that there is the attainment of reforms
aimed at rehabilitation over punishment as the goal. This paper makes a
comparison of the European sentencing system and that of the United States in
order to enhance the view that the United States can learn from its European
counterparts concerning how best to handle a diversity of criminal acts,
including what is considered the most heinous.
One
of the most important factors for the U.S. Sentencing Commission to consider is
that the European sentencing system is more advanced. This is because countries
such as Germany and the Netherlands focus more on rehabilitation than mass
incarceration, as is the case in the United States (Subramanian & Shames, 2013). In the United States, there
has been more of a focus on punishment, which has resulted in a scenario where
individuals who commit even the most petty of crimes or offenses end up being
incarcerated, with the result being that the individuals involved become worse
off than would otherwise have been the case.
The
sentencing systems of the Netherlands and Germany are centered around the
concept to making sure that there is the promotion of rehabilitation. This is
in contrast to the United States, where there is the promotion of retribution
are at the center of sentencing (Subramanian & Shames, 2013). A consequence of this
scenario is that rehabilitation and reform in the United States has become a
secondary goal. The German sentencing system is enshrined in law and it states
that the rehabilitation of inmates should be the primary goal. In this way, it
has become pertinent to make sure that there is the promotion of a scenario
where there is the attainment of the goal of rehabilitating criminals over
punishing them to ensure effective reintegration to society.
Furthermore,
in the United States, fines are used in combination with other sanctions. This
is not the case with European countries such as the Netherlands, where fines
are often standalone sentences and are not combined with other punishments (Subramanian & Shames, 2013). In fact, in this country,
fines are preferred over prison sentences, which is significant because it
shows the manner through which the justice system has moved on towards ensuring
the use of proportional sentencing to the crime that was committed. Because of
this, courts are required to provide special reasons for making use of
incarceration over fines.
In
Germany, the fine is also considered to be an effective means of rehabilitating
criminals. In this country, the day fine approach is used, and it is done in
such a way that fines are imposed daily in units representing a day in
incarceration. This sentencing is designed to make sure that there is the
promotion of a scenario where there is the achievement of the goal of making
offenders, especially those who have committed serious crimes, understand the
gravity of their crimes. It further allows offenders from different economic
conditions to ensure that they are able to have the same impact from fines as
punishment for their actions.
Another
significant different in the sentencing process is the length of the
incarceration that is imposed on offenders. Generally, the European sentencing
system is one that allows for lower incarceration length for crimes than is the
case in the United States. These shorter sentences are significant because they
ensure that there is the promotion of a scenario where offenders are able to
rehabilitate and rejoin society. Thus, most of the incarcerated individuals in
Germany tend to have sentences of less than 2 years, which is significant
because it allows for a focus on rehabilitation over punishment, as seen in the
United States where longer sentences even for minor offenses are the norm.
The
incarceration rates in the United States soared in the 1980s despite an
environment of relatively stable or declining crime rates (Kuhlmann, 2011). A consequence of this scenario is that it has
led to a scenario where the correctional institutions of the nation ended up abandoning
the goal of rehabilitation and instead, there was the advancement of the need
to control the prison population. Consequently, there were little efforts aimed
at reforming the prison population, and instead, there was an attempt to ensure
that incarceration became more punitive. This situation left many prisoners
unprepared to rejoin society, and it is the reason behind the high recidivism
rates in the United States when compared to European countries such as Germany
and the Netherlands, where the major focus is rehabilitation. The fact that the
United States has essentially turned incarceration into punishment over
rehabilitation has allowed for the continued growth of its prison population as
well as the high levels of recidivism.
The
United States has developed a system within which individuals are personally
blamed for their criminal behavior. There is a failure to consider that the
socioeconomic conditions prevalent in the lives of individuals could be the
main reason behind their resorting to a life in crime (Kury, 2019).
It is necessary to make sure that there is an understanding of the
socioeconomic background of the individuals involved prior to sentencing; a
fact that is always considered in European nations. The significance of this
circumstance is that the United States has ended up creating an environment
within which there is not only a massive incarcerated population, but most of
this population is not reformed and therefore unable to easily fit in with
society once released. It is therefore essential to consider that there is the
need for a correctional system that is not only aimed at the punishment of
offenders, but also one that allows for rehabilitation to such an extent that recidivism
is brought to an end.
The
deficiencies in the American criminal justice system have come about because of
the ‘tough on crime’ policy. This policy is significant because it has created
an environment within which members of poor, minority communities have ended up
being disproportionately incarcerated to such an extent that many of these
individuals end up showing considerable recidivism (Marble, 2018).
The most disenfranchised individuals in American society by the criminal
justice system are those from the African American community. The members of
this community have essentially been disproportionately represented in American
prisons because of racial profiling that assumes that they are guilty under all
circumstances. In this way, it has become necessary to make sure that there is
the promotion of a situation where there is the adoption of social reforms that
allow members of this community to overcome the devastation that incarceration
has had on it. The adoption of the European system in the United States could
ensure that there is the attainment of the goal of rehabilitation and a
reduction in the use of incarceration. Thus, not only would rehabilitation be
possible, but offenders would be allowed to take on more productive roles in
society.
In
conclusion, the discussion above has made a comparison of the European
sentencing system and that of the United States in order to enhance the view
that the United States can learn from its European counterparts concerning how
best to handle a diversity of criminal acts. It has shown that the criminal
justice system in Europe, specifically Germany and the Netherlands, has a lower
incarceration and recidivism rate because of the focus on rehabilitation over
punishment. The punishment of crime in the United States is a focus that has
come about mainly because of the considerable increase in the prison
population. This has created an environment within which control of the
population has become more important than rehabilitation; resulting in a
failure to prepare these individuals to rejoin society. Thus, individuals that
have been incarcerated in the United States have little chance of returning to
a normal life; requiring that there are reforms aimed at making sure that their
interests, and those of society, are protected.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.