Among
the main reasons that have been states concerning why the American civil
confrontation came to pass was because of the issue of the abolition of slavery
in the United States. This was a situation which many of the southern states
could not accept, mainly due to the fact that their economies depended heavily
on slave labor. They believed that if slavery was abolished in their states,
then there was a likelihood of economic collapse. To counter this challenge to
their economy, mainly from the northern states of the union, whose economies
did not depend on slaves, the southern states declared themselves to be
independent of the union and instead chose to create their own. These came to
be known as the Confederate states, all of whose members were slave owning
states. Barbara Fields, however, disagrees with this assumption stating that
the United States made war on the Confederates, not because of the abolition of
slavery, but because it wanted to preserve the Union (Rios). The Emancipation
of all the slaves in the Union was simply an excuse made to start the war that
would force the southern states back into the Union. According to Fields, the
northern states only declared war on the Confederate states because they not
only wanted to preserve the Union, but also to ensure that they did not have a
powerful rival. In essence, the northern states wanted to retain their
advantage as the leading states in the Union by enforcing their dominance. This
situation led to the coming to prominence of two men, whose views on slavery
were entirely opposite of one another. The first is Abraham Lincoln was among
the biggest proponents of the eradication of slavery in all the states within
the Union as well as the preservation of the latter (Pinsker 59). The other is
Jefferson Davis, who was a principal proponent of the institution of slavery
and believed that it was a necessary part of the southern economy.
While
many in the non slaveholding north supported the declaration, many in the south
viewed it as the federal government’s attempt to interfere with their internal
affairs. According to Shelby Foote, among the most prominent advocates of this
viewpoint was none other than Jefferson Davis, who was a staunch believer in
the right of all the states within the union to make their own decision without
interference. He believed that all the states in the union had joined it
voluntarily, and this gave them the independence to decide what was and what
was not best for them. If the federal government were to keep interfering in
the domestic dealings of the states, then these states would inevitably lose
their sovereignty, defeating the purpose of the formation of the union (Dawson
592). He is noted to have stated that since all states had joined the union of
their own free will, they also had the right to leave it if they felt that
their interests were not being represented in a manner to their liking.
Furthermore, Davis believed that the decision to end slavery lay with the
individual states themselves, and not with the federal government. It is
extremely likely that it was because of this stance that when the southern
states chose to leave the union, they chose him to be their leader. His vision
was to maintain slavery in the Confederate states and to expand this
institution south into Mexico as this new slave owning federation grew.
According to Foote, therefore, the American Civil war did not take place
because of the need for the southern states to retain slavery, but for them to
be able to determine their own destiny without any interference from the
northern states, which dominated the United States at the time (Bolin 38). Many
southerners at the time felt that the northern states wanted to enforce their
will upon them so that they would remain a backwater and this is the reason why
they chose to break from the Union.
In
the matter if abolition, however, many have come to believe the reasons for Lincoln
going to war, who stated that maintaining slavery in the United States would be
a mockery of the democratic ideals on which the federation was founded.
Moreover, it was not right to keep the black people slaves just because of
their skin color or the belief that they were less intelligent than the whites.
Such beliefs were by the time of the American Civil War, become outdated, and
one would speculate that it was inevitable that this conflict took place. It
was a war, not only to force the emancipation of the slaves in the south, but
also one to destroy those beliefs which kept the democratic progress of the
United States bogged down. Foote and Fields have come to challenge the above
beliefs by introducing their own theories concerning why the war took place.
Their most common belief is the fact that while the civil war took place in the
name of abolition, this was in fact not the case, since it was a war more for
political dominance than for the freeing of slaves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.