Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Humans are a social species, which has both positive and negative consequences for society

 Part 1

Humans are a social species and as such have developed highly advanced capacities to socialize. Humanity has evolved in such a way that it is capable of ensuring that it is able to not only promote its interests, but also those of other species across the planet. Thus, human beings have risen from being prey for other species, to being the apex predator of the planet, and this situation has come about mainly because of their ability to socialize. Socialization has allowed for the establishment of a scenario within which humanity is better able to communicate with one another to such an extent that they have made great achievements. However, while this may be the case, it is essential to note that humanity, because of its ability to socialize, has also shown a capacity for destruction that is unprecedented in the history of the world. Not only have humans developed some of the worst weapons to fight one another, such as nuclear and biological weapons, they have also undertaken courses of action that can only be considered self-destructive, as seen in the manner through which climate change and its resulting effects are not being taken seriously. This paper makes an evaluation of the claim that humans are a social species that have both positive and negative consequences for society.

One of the most fundamental characteristics that mark humanity is their need and ability to socialize. This species seems to have been built to attain socialization, and this can be seen in the manner through which humans will constantly seek out other humans not only for companionship, but also to attain a sense of community (Hardman, 2009). Humans seem to only be able to thrive when they are with other humans, meaning that they cannot attain their full potential without the company of others of their species. It is pertinent to note that because of this characteristic, humans have also been able to establish themselves into societies; a factor that cannot be underestimated. This is because humanity has, through socialization and the establishment of societies, been able to secure for itself a large part of the world. Societies are what makes humans one of the most unique species on the planet because they not only provide these individuals with an environment within which they feel safe, but they also ensure that these individuals are better able to master their environment and establish unique communities. Thus, socialization has allowed humanity to thrive in all environments across the world, from the mildest to the harshest climates. The need and ability to socialize has also allowed for the establishment of an environment within which humans have been able to thrive in a manner that has yet to be achieved by any other species. Socialization can be considered responsible for the establishment of human civilization and the manner through which these civilizations have been able to develop and grow in their uniqueness.

Additionally, the ability of humans to socialize has also established their capacity to help one another. It has allowed members of this species to develop societies that can be considered avenues of mutual assistance. Societies allow individuals within them a place within which they can support one another, as seen through how different talents are brought together for mutual benefit. The specialization in different tasks that is prevalent in society is an aspect of socialization because human beings within such societies are able to make use of their unique talents to advance the course of their communities (Hardman, 2009). Furthermore, in modern society, as the gap between the rich and poor has widened, there has developed attempts by some of those that are wealthier to provide support to the poorer ones through a diversity of philanthropic initiatives. Also, in certain communities, such as those that have Islam as the official religion, individuals that are well off are obligated to support their poorer counterparts as a means of making sure that all individuals have their basic needs fulfilled. Humans, therefore, are a species that because of their ability to socialize, have developed a sense of empathy towards one another. Empathy is a characteristic that is most observed in humans, which shows that despite the considerable differences between the environments in which they live, it remains paramount. It is for this reason that humans are the species that stays with their young for the longest period because the latter are not only helpless at birth, but human parents will often invest considerable time and effort into ensuring that their children grow up in a safe environment. The latter characteristic is one that has allowed humanity to establish strong bonds of community that has ensured the species continues to thrive against all odds.

However, despite the latter being the case, humans, because of their being a social species, also has the capacity to cause great harm to one another. This can be seen through the wars that have taken place throughout human history. Most of the wars or conflicts that have taken place are between human communities as they compete because of pride due to their ethnicity or over resources (Hardman, 2009). Consequently, the human ability to socialize, which has allowed for the establishment of communities, has also led to these communities viewing others as rivals. Conflict is a part of human nature, and this has become prevalent, especially when one considers how this species has established communities with distinct identities. Fighting over resources has been a factor of human existence since the beginning of societies, and it has resulted in the deaths of uncountable individuals. Furthermore, in the process of these conflicts, some human communities have shown a great capacity for violence, as they have undertaken to not only conquer their weaker neighbors, but also exterminate them through genocidal acts. This can be seen in the case of such major events of the modern world as the genocides that took place during the Yugoslav Wars and the Rwanda genocide in the 1990s, among many others throughout human history. The capacity of humanity to cause harm to others is born out of the idea that their community is superior to others, and this was the justification for the European powers colonizing other parts of the world during the age of empires. The colonization process in most cases was undertaken violently, to such an extent that in some parts of the world, the native communities became extinct.

Moreover, the human capacity to cause harm can be seen through the harm it has caused to the environment. The latter can be considered to have also come about because of humans being a social species. The rapid growth of human societies and urban areas created a demand for goods and services that could no longer be sustained through subsistence, hence the development of industrialization and the mass production involved in the provision of these products. Consequently, the continued demand for resources and products has created a situation where considerable harm has been caused to the environment through the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere (Adams, 2020). The urge to increase human economic output is a driving force in today's globe. This is a process that encompasses both the consumption of commodities and their way of production, and it frequently overlooks the need to promote environmental concerns (Adams, 2020). As a result of this condition, without concern for human beings' living environment, it is becoming increasingly impossible to ensure that it is protected from harm. Human activity is putting significant strain on the planet's natural functioning. This is a critical topic because it entails a scenario in which the varied ecosystems present on Earth may be unable to sustain future generations.

Therefore, it is essential to make sure that there is the promotion of a scenario where it is possible to bring about the creation of initiatives where humans are able to change for the better. This process requires that humanity learn to work together hand in hand as a means of not only preventing causing harm to one another, but also to the environment. The human ability to socialize can therefore be brought to the fore in order to promote the development of strong initiatives aimed at ensuring the prevention of its harmful effects. For example, the issue of preserving diverse ecosystems for the benefit of future generations cannot be taken for granted, and there is an urgent need to promote an effective way of mitigating this problem (Adams, 2020). The latter is an urgent issue which requires cooperation from all sectors of human society in order to be effective. Additionally, humans have the international institutions necessary to ensure that the effects of conflict and climate change are mitigated effectively in order to bring about lasting solutions to these problems. Also, ecologically sustainable behavior patterns are a pertinent means of making sure that there is the achievement of the goal of making all humans responsible for their actions towards the environment. This change in culture, from one dominated by consumerism to one that is environmentally conscious, has the potential of playing an important role in not only bringing about a greater level of sustainability with a diversity of ecosystems intact, but it also allows for a reduction or even elimination of the social inequality that is prevalent in modern society.

In conclusion, humans as a social species are capable of causing both positive and negative consequences for society. They have the capacity to ensure that not only is it possible to achieve great things through working together, but also establishing frameworks of mutual protection and support. However, while the latter may be the case, it is also necessary to consider that humans as a social species cause significant destruction as seen through the senseless violence towards one another during conflicts, and the undertaking of activities that are harmful to the environment. The latter have become matters of serious concern in the modern world to such an extent that there are calls for action to be taken. There is the need to promote the idea that humans have to take advantage of their ability to socialize in order to undertake actions to bring about behavior patterns that ensure environmental sustainability and an end to conflicts with one another.

Part 2

One of the most significant factors concerning the modern world is that conspiracy theories have become more prevalent. This has developed to such an extent that it has to be taken seriously in order for there to be effective means of preventing it from spreading. For most of the human population, conspiracy theories might be difficult to take seriously to such an extent that when individuals hear them, they are more likely to ignore them than to accept them as fact (Byford, 2011). The belief that there are secret masterminds behind events and that there are major cover ups on a global scale is actually a factor that is only chuckled over when heard. However, with the advent of social media, this has become a serious problem. It can be seen in the manner through which the students have readily accepted the belief that tracking devices have been put in their vehicles to monitor them and that the solution is to use their phones when driving. Such conspiracies and belief in them can be considered detrimental to the welfare of the students involved because it creates an environment of fear and risk taking that is in reality nothing to worry about. The recognition of the fact that this theory and others like it might be endangering the lives of students is enough to promote the need to advance initiatives to understand the reasons behind why students believe them. The latter is a challenge that needs to be established as a means of bringing about the promotion of a scenario where there are effective means of reversing their effects on the beliefs of the students involved and instead promote risk aversion behavior when they are driving.

One of the most significant factors that might lead the students to believe the abovementioned conspiracy theory is that they want to maintain control over their lives. This is especially the case where they feel that they do not have control and this sense requires that they take on actions that help them regain it. In this case, they are essentially becoming influenced by a form of bias that enforces their outlook of the world over those that are factual. The human mind has evolved to value consistency and regularity. As a result, when a great crisis occurs, whether locally or nationally, the unexpected unpredictability scares individuals to such an extent that they will want to get back to control. Consequently, these individuals will seek satisfactory explanations for what is happening, even if they are patently incorrect (Byford, 2011). Conspiracy theories appear to supply the answers that these individuals seek. The latter might prove a challenge because it allows individuals the belief in something that makes them comfortable and in control. It reduces their capacity to think beyond the theories that have been presented to them; instead creating a scenario where they are placed in a position of great vulnerability. It is this vulnerability that leads to the problem mentioned; namely driving while on the phone. Most of the information concerning this theory comes from social media, meaning that the students have to be prevented from viewing such sites. This can be done through the school essentially reporting the site and its contents to government regulators so that further action can be taken.

However, this is only the first step, the next one being to encourage group counseling sessions that will allow for the debunking of the conspiracy theories. This process will require that there is the identification of those individuals that believe in the conspiracy and play an active role in its spread. It is noteworthy that such individuals are attracted to the idea of the presence of a huge villain, which is one of the distinguishing characteristics of any conspiracy. Whatever the plot says, they will almost certainly lay the blame at the feet of an underground group that's pulling the strings of the world right under their noses. They can be real, like the government, or fictional, like the Illuminati, but they all play a vital role in the plot. Such beliefs are fueled because a strong belief that only a few people share such a lonely experience (Byford, 2011). Humans are social creatures by nature, and most people do not want to feel like the recluses and outliers that conspiracy theorists sometimes portray. Certainly the internet has solved this dilemma, for better or for worse, as there are now hundreds of social networks where like-minded conspiracy theorists can communicate, discuss their theories and have their beliefs verified by others.

Therefore, there is need to target those students that feel isolated and are therefore susceptible to such theories. Those who are self-conscious are more inclined than others to believe in conspiracy theories, maybe to deflect blame for their failings. Powerlessness, anxiety, solitude, and alienation have all been connected to conspiracy ideas (Byford, 2011). Those who believe they are unimportant cogs in the political, economic, and social wheel are more likely to believe that malevolent forces are at work. Meanwhile, other techniques of addressing misinformation should not be abandoned because they contribute to its reduction. Debunking is exceedingly tough, yet it has the potential to be successful. Rather than just labeling something wrong or misleading, debunkers must explain why it is untrue, pointing attention to deception methods and presenting evidence. It may be more beneficial to inform students about conspiracy ideas ahead of time. It can operate as a preventative measure against disinformation. This strategy alerts individuals to the possibility of disinformation before they believe it. Addressing the students' psychological needs may amplify these impacts. This may make conspiracy theories and other falsehoods less appealing, as well as increase overall well-being. Education disproves conspiracy theories by developing critical thinking and empowering individuals. Other approaches might foster a sense of shared identity, enhancing emotions of belonging and significance. There should be an emphasis on solidarity within the student body and making sure that there is the advancement of means through which students are encouraged to make use of the institution’s counseling services. This will not only combat the effects of loneliness and anxiety that makes students vulnerable to conspiracy theories, but will further enhance their ability to resist the temptation of believing conspiracy theories.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Adams, M. (2020) Anthropocene psychology: Being human in a more-than-human world.   Routledge.

Byford, J. (2011) Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction.   Springer.

Hardman, D. (2009) Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives.   John Wiley & Sons.

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

Proportional Representation in Canada

 

Electoral reform is one of the most significant issues when it comes to the Canadian political scene. This is especially considering that there have been calls for the establishment of a more proportional system of government aimed at promoting the continued expansion of the democratic space in the country. The adoption of a proportional representation electoral system, despite the resistance it has got from a number of the major political parties, has the potential of making sure that there is the achievement of greater representation in parliament. I make the argument that the adoption of proportional representation will ensure that there is the establishment of fair voting policies, a reduction of exaggerated differences between the regions, and that government policy is established with the consent of the majority will of parliament.

The adoption of a proportional system of representation will ensure that there is the establishment of fair voting policies. The current voting system is one that essentially gives parties a false majority in parliament and this creates a situation where it is difficult to ensure that the will of the people is fulfilled. Instead, the political party with a parliamentary majority ends up essentially dictating policy without necessarily having to consult with other political parties and actors (Kedar, Harsgor, & Sheinerman, 2016). A consequence of this situation is that it ends up leading to the failure of the system being democratic because there is essentially a dictatorship over the political scene by one political party that does not represent the interests of all the members of society. Therefore, the adoption of a proportional representation system will make sure that there is the reduction of incidents of one party dictatorship over government policy because under such a system, all parties that pass a certain threshold in the elections will be eligible to gain parliamentary seats (Döring & Manow, 2017). Under such circumstances, fairer voting policies will not only encourage more individuals in society to vote, but it will also allow for political parties with a diversity of ideas that are good for the nation to gain representation.

Proportional representation has the potential of bringing an end to those instances where there are exaggerated differences between the various regions of the country. This is especially the case considering that political parties in Canada tend to be either regional, or are parties that favor some regions over others (Davidson et al., 2017). The current political system is therefore one that is skewed towards the parties that have the most parliamentary power; meaning that there is little democratic policy making.  Instead, the party that has a majority essentially favors those regions that it has the most support to the detriment of others. Therefore, the adoption of an electoral system that has proportional representation at its center ensures that there is the advancement of equal advantages for all the regions of Canada irrespective of political parties. Regional differences have often been exaggerated and exploited by regional political parties in order to ensure that they are able to maintain strong voter bases. However, with the introduction of proportional representation, it is likely that such moves will no longer be able to work for political parties. Instead, parties will focus more on the development of policies based on consensus rather than seeking to gain popularity in those regions where they believe that their power lies.

A significant aspect of proportional representation is that it ensures that governance is conducted by the will of the majority of parliament. In the current Canadian system, the political party that has a majority can make policies without having to consult with other parties (Norris, 1997). This is a trend that will no longer be able to work in a system where there is proportional representation because it will involve a situation where the party in power has to consult with all others before developing and implementing policies. Furthermore, under such a system, it is likely that no party will have an absolute majority in parliament meaning that it will be essential for coalitions to be formed and greater consultation to be made; making policies more democratic (Thames, 2017). Under such circumstances, it will be possible to make sure that there is the advancement of policies that benefit all the people in society that are represented in parliament rather than only a specific group of people, as is currently the case. It is also possible that minorities will also obtain greater representation especially considering that they currently have very little representation (Lazarus & Hall, 2016).

In conclusion, a proportional representation electoral system is pertinent because it will allow for democratic decision-making by government. It will further ensure that there is the creation of an environment where all political parties and their followers are able to gain the representation that can promote the achievement of greater democratic space. A consequence of such a situation is that the new system will make sure that there is the advancement of democracy throughout all the regions of Canada irrespective of political affiliation.

Sunday, April 17, 2022

Impact of William Jennings Bryan

 William Jennings Bryan was one of the greatest political figures in the history of America. He was an individual that was well known for his strong stances against injustice as well as being an extremely moral individual based on his Christian beliefs. Moreover, he was a great orator who came to influence the manner through which presidential campaigns are conducted to this day. A consequence of this situation was that he ended up being nominated to run for president by the Democratic Party three times (Kazin, 2007, p. 94); which was a feat that few have ever achieved. Bryan was an individual who promoted a number of causes including an opposition to the gold standard, the spread of democratic ideals, being opposed to American imperialism, support for prohibition, and an opposition to Darwinism.

One of the most important stances taken by Bryan was that he was extremely opposed to the gold standard. He believed that this currency standard was one that essentially promoted the interests of the eastern elites at the expense of common people in society. He felt that it would be best to ensure that rather than having a gold standard, there was a situation where a bimetallic currency standard was adopted. A bimetallic standard involved the use of both gold and silver as bases for the currency so that it would be able to ensure that all people in the country, especially the commoners, were able to benefit from it (Kazin, 2007, p. 95). This stance was important in ensuring that he gained considerable support within the Democratic Party that ended up bringing about his being nominated as a presidential candidate by the party. His strong stance when it came to the opposition to the gold standard and support for the rights of the commoners in society ensured that he maintained control over the Democratic Party for many years until such a time as his stances became unpopular with other party elites following his losses in presidential elections.

Another stance that Bryan took was that there was need to ensure that the United States took leadership in the spread of democracy across the world. This stance was one that saw America as the bastion of democracy and self-determination and it was his firm belief that human development and prosperity could not be possible without democracy. While he was on principle opposed to the use of the American military when it came to forcing American interests of other countries, Bryan ended up feeling that it could be used for helping people across the world achieve self-determination. This position was essential especially when it came to the Spanish-American War, where despite his opposition to military intervention, Bryan promoted the idea that it was important for Spanish colonies to be given the right of self-rule (Kazin, 2007, p. 91). He became an important advocate for the war, but rather than doing so for imperial reasons, he sought to ensure that there was the establishment of means through which the Spanish colonies would be given the right to determine their own future rather than living under the yoke of imperial rule. Therefore, his support for the Spanish-American War was based on a firm belief that European colonialism was a hindrance to the democratic process.

However, despite his promotion of the use of the military to ensure the spread of democracy, Bryan was opposed to imperialism of all types. He envisioned a role for the United States as being an example of what a truly democratic state was and considered any attempt by the country to acquire territories as essentially being a betrayal of its founding ideals. This was especially the case considering that at the time, in the late nineteenth century, European nations were actively promoting their imperialistic agendas in Africa and Asia, where they were acquiring new colonies and subjugating the native people of those continents. Bryan was opposed to such moves by the United States and following the Spanish-American War was against the manner through which America gained territorial concessions from Spain where it ended up securing the Philippines in order to establish a military base (Kazin, 2007, p. 89). Bryan looked upon this process as being a betrayal of American ideals and came to compare the move as the United States becoming an imperialist power in the same way that Britain and other European powers had become. This stance was one that he maintained even when he was Secretary of State for President Woodrow Wilson, and it also encouraged his opposition to American entry into the First World War.

Bryan was an individual that took an extremely moralist position when it came to social issues in America. A position that he took and defended considerably was his support for the prohibition. Bryan was raised in an extremely religious environment, which saw the consumption of alcohol as essentially being against the moral values of society. A result of this situation was that he gave his full support for the prohibition and campaigned for it until such a time as it was made a part of the law. His moral stance concerning this matter was so great that he ended up in a situation where despite his being a staunch Democrat, he refused to support those presidential candidates that he believed were against the prohibition. Another aspect of his strong moral stance was the support that he gave to the matter of women suffrage, and this was such a great success that it was made into law. The achievement of this goal cannot be underestimated especially considering that at the time, women suffrage was still a contentious issue in society.

Bryan’s opposition to Darwinism was also extremely well-known in American society. His stance was exemplified through his representation of the World Christian Fundamentals Association in the Scopes Trial where he argued based on his Christian beliefs. In the end, he was able to win the trial because he believed that the adoption of Darwinism would essentially create an environment where there was no moral authority in society. Instead, a society where the strong dominated the weak would be created and this would bring about a situation where all moral values would be meaningless.

In conclusion, William Jennings Bryan was a highly influential individual in the United States both when in politics and later as a private citizen. He promoted ideals that were aimed at protecting commoners, who were a majority in society, against the excesses of the elite. Moreover, he was a true democrat who believed in a world governed by democracy and was opposed to any form of imperialism; which he believed to be detrimental to the principle of self-determination.

 Reference

Kazin, M. (2007). A godly hero: The life of William Jennings Bryan: Anchor.