Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Is Artificial Intelligence a Threat?

 

In the contemporary world, human beings are increasingly living longer and healthier lives than was the case decades ago. This is an important measure because it shows that despite some of the problems that are prevalent within it, the world has become a better place for human beings. However, despite this being the situation, the headlines in newspapers and other media tend to show considerable human suffering, to such an extent that there seems to be little hope in the world. Challenges such as climate change, rising sea levels, and the threat of mass extinction from the political and climatic instability that have become prevalent in the world have created a highly pessimistic attitude towards the future. While this may be the case, it is essential to consider that humans are increasingly developing new technologies in order to ensure that there is the achievement of the ideal lifestyle. Among the most prominent of these new technologies is artificial intelligence (AI), which is predicted to have a considerable impact on the lives of humans in future. AI is an essential technology because its advancement will ensure that there are numerous benefits for humanity. It has the potential of making sure that such activities as weather predictions and cancer diagnoses, as well as other critical aspects of human society are made much easier.

AI is the technology of the future and its fullest potential is yet to be unlocked. It brings with it numerous opportunities and challenges, with the former being more pertinent than the latter. The opportunities presented by AI are among the most important when it comes to making sure that humans end up not only surviving on the planet, but also undertaking tasks that are critical. Prominent individuals such as Bill Gates have sought to promote the idea that AI provides an opportunity for humans to be more creative and productive than is currently the case. However, Elon Musk, on the other hand, promotes the idea that AI has the potential of ending up posing an existential threat to humans (Bentley, Brundage, Häggström, & Metzinger, 2018). While these two individuals differ on the characteristics of AI and whether it is a threat, they both agree that AI is the technology of the future and it will end up becoming an inseparable part of human life. Therefore, rather than seeing AI as a threat, it is necessary for individuals to make sure that they undertake a reflection on the manner through which this technology can be managed in such a way that rather than posing a risk to humanity, it can be a means of providing considerable benefits (Boden et al., 2017). AI is not just a matter of the future, but has become a critical aspect of the lives of individuals across the world. Thus, for better or for worse, AI is and will continue to be a part of the lives of humans, and this is to such an extent that it will likely end up playing an important role in such important aspects of life such as the administration of the criminal justice system.

In addition, rather than being a threat, AI is a highly competent technology which has the ability of executing a large number of tasks at a rapid pace. This is an ability that is beyond most humans, because the latter often need a lot of time and resources to accomplish even the simplest of tasks. AI is important because it has the ability to overcome the cognitive and organizational limitations displayed by humans and instead handle many tasks in a very short time with limited resources. A consequence of this reality is that humans are in need of AI in the process of making sure that tasks that are beyond them can be accomplished not only at a faster pace, but also in a more competent manner with few errors. The latter process, however, should not be considered a threat to the human workforce, because contrary to popular belief, humans are still a necessary aspect in any organization, even if they adopt AI (Yudkowsky, 2008). AI is only considered a threat because of its ability to undertake tasks at a faster pace, but while this may be the case, it is necessary to consider that there is need for humans in the same work environment in order to undertake a diversity of tasks that not only require reasoning, but also a physical touch. AI can be made use of in a diversity of contexts, which is critical in the contemporary world. Under such circumstances, AI is a technology that can complement humans, and its use, not only in the workplace setting, but also in the social environment, could go a long way towards not only improving lives, but also making life much easier for individuals.

Also, the appropriate application of sophisticated AI systems can help in the resolution of numerous intractable societal problems and conflicts. AI systems can be used in the promotion of resolutions to collective action problems, which are among the most prevalent in the contemporary world (Bentley et al., 2018). This is especially the case considering that there is a constant need to make sure that there is the promotion of a situation where there is the improvement of coordination between diverse groups in a bid to achieve similar goals. Coordination between different parties is often required to ensure that there is the effective achievement of common goals. However, it is human nature to be competitive as a means of making sure that individual goals are achieved at all times. However, the use of AI is critical in making sure that there is the achievement of common goals, in such a way that makes it possible to make seemingly unattainable goals a reality. It is often difficult to monitor human behavior and to detect defects in them in order to ensure that work takes place as expected. While this may be the case, it is noteworthy to consider that the use of AI can bring about considerable improvements, in such a way that makes sure that there is the promotion of effective means of detecting human behavior, especially the ones that might prove negative to the achievement of the tasks that are being carried out, especially in a project or within activities in the workplace. Moreover, AI can play a pivotal role in the establishment of means through which governments coordinate their activities within international institutions. While human intentions tend to be concealed within opaque minds, the same cannot be said about AI, which, because of its openness can be able to ensure greater accountability.

It is pertinent to consider that while AI is applied in a diversity of ways, one of the most pertinent is in government surveillance. This is an extremely important activity because it involves a process where there is the promotion of the interests of the public. Among these interests is security, which is a critical element of the role of government, with AI ensuring that there is the establishment of means through which monitoring on individuals, especially those who are either suspected of crime, or terrorism, to such an extent that they end up being prevented from undertaking some of their activities. However, while this may be the case, it is essential to consider that AI is often abused by governments and companies in such a way that they encroach on the privacy of individuals. A consequence of this situation is that it ends up leading to accusations of AI being out of control and the argument that it should not be used in any form of monitoring. The latter case is one that can be considered to be false, because it is the users of AI, rather than AI itself, who are responsible for its abuse (Epstein, 2015). AI is an extremely useful technology when it comes to ensuring that there is the promotion of effective security, and this is especially the case considering that AI can be made use of as a means of monitoring areas of potential cooperation, such as arms control and cybercrime. It is also essential to consider that while AI can be abused, it is mostly used for the achievement of good objectives and is a tool and not intelligence all on itself, because its major controllers are humans. Thus, AI is not the threat that it is made out to be, and to consider it to have the potential of facilitating abuse of the privacy of individuals by governments and companies is not true.

AI is an essential tool when it comes to the process of unlocking a society that is based on ethics and leisure for individuals within it. Predictions have shown that AI is going to play a critical role in making sure that there is the automation of jobs (Lawrence, 2017). The automation of human jobs will ensure that the individuals involved have more time in their hands to undertake activities that they enjoy. Instead of taking over human jobs, AI is a tool which will ensure that there is the promotion of the goal of bringing about significant changes to the work environment (Russell, Hauert, Altman, & Veloso, 2015). AI will not replace human workers, and instead, the latter will have to be present in the workplace to ensure that the AI systems are working properly. As the ultimate controllers of these systems, human workers will require to develop new skill sets aimed at making sure that they advance the skills that they already have to encompass the involvement of AI in their work environment. While the time period before the automation of all human jobs has still not been determined, it is noteworthy to consider that with automation, human workers will have more leisure time. Instead of being a threat to jobs, AI will ensure that there is the establishment of a new type of society, where there is the renegotiation of the social contract in such a way that leaves humans at an advantage. A new social contract would involve the establishment of stronger ethical requirements within society, in such a way that individuals would be helped by AI to undertake their work in a manner that is as efficient as possible, while at the same time allowing for the continued presence of humans in the workforce as controllers and supervisors of the AI systems.

AI is the technology of the future and it is here to stay. Therefore, it is necessary to make sure that there is an understanding of the way that this technology is going to expand its influence across various aspects of the lives of individuals. However, this technology should not be viewed as a threat because it is one that, despite its seemingly independent nature, is actually under the direct control of humans. This means that even in a situation where jobs and other functions increasingly become automated; there are instances where there will be a process that seeks to involve humans in the workforce. In addition, the automation of various aspects of human life has the potential of triggering a new type of society, where individuals within it agree to a new system that enhances the human role (Chui, Manyika, & Miremadi, 2015). For example, governments could end up agreeing to create a value in work, and that paid work should continue because it is one of the ways of enhancing its value. A consequence of this situation is likely to be that humans will end up seeking to undertake activities that they find to be rewarding to themselves rather than just being involved in the workforce because of a desire to earn money. Furthermore, in a system that is dominated by AI, humans could end up in a scenario where they are able to earn some money from their governments to help them live comfortably while at the same time seeking to establish a society where they are able to have a higher standard of living through their own efforts. AI has the potential of making sure that human society is greatly improved from what it is today, where the economic worries of individuals make it extremely difficult for individuals to focus more on their personal interests.

In conclusion, the presence of AI is not a threat to humans, and should instead be considered to be an advantage because it is a technology whose potential is limitless. The achievement of the goal of automating work could go a long way towards making it possible for human society to change for the better in such a way that enhances the lives of individuals. AI is also an essential aspect when it comes to bringing about an enhancement of efficiency in the delivery of services, in such a way that promotes the establishment of more responsible government, while at the same time helping in bringing about more effective ways of managing problems associated with collective action such as climate change mitigation. AI is going to become the biggest part of the global economy in future, and its increasing use in various technologies shows that it is widely accepted by people across the world. So far, it has not proven to be a threat, and has instead become one of the best ways of helping facilitate the ease of life among individuals.

Monday, February 15, 2021

The Gun Range

 

Learning how to shoot accurately is one of the skills that are considered essential for any gun owner. This is the reason why gun ranges, both indoor and outdoor, have been developed over the years. However, all gun ranges require that individuals who make use of them know and understand the safety rules and procedures. This is the reason why in recent years, a considerable number of gun ranges have developed short videos that show their members what they need to know before they begin making use of the ranges. When an individual goes to the gun range, one of the most essential acts is to sign a waiver that states that he or she understands and will abide by all the safety policies that have been developed by the range. Furthermore, signing the waiver ensures that the gun range is waived from any liabilities in case of a situation where a user ends up hurting either themselves or someone else, because such a situation is normal and is often expected from time to time. The gun range is a place where individuals learn more about being responsible gun handlers and helps ensure that safety is always made a priority.

It is important that close attention is paid to the list of rules that the range has, because almost all ranges have their own unique set of rules that need to be followed. These rules are pertinent to the respective range and they include those things that they may either allow or not allow. It is essential that the rules are double checked because they are posted prominently, and in situations where the individual is not sure, it is important that the range officer is asked before anything new is tried; especially in situations where something has not been tried before on that particular range. There are instances where some ranges, especially trap ranges, do not allow the use of pump shotguns that have a pistol grip. Another example is those ranges that do not allow individuals to make use of drills that involve the drawing of pistols from the holster because it is deemed dangerous.

There are a number of rules that have to be followed within a gun range and these have to be considered at all times. These rules exist for the safety of both the users of the range as well as their neighbors within the range, and it is important that they are followed to the letter. One of the most essential rules that have to be followed is that guns should not be loaded until such a time as the user is on the firing line and is ready to begin shooting. It is also important that the muzzle of the gun is constantly pointed down range because it is an essential means of enhancing the safety of all individuals using the range. It is also critical that the user keeps their gun within a case until they are in position along the shooting line, and following this step, it is essential that the user only shoots at their target and avoid shooting across lanes at all times. Within the gun range, it is a requirement that the users are careful not to shoot towards the floor, the sidewalls, or the ceiling because to do so has the risk of having ricocheting bullets damaging the facility. Furthermore, they have the bullets have the potential of ending up coming back towards the line, which puts the individuals in the range at risk. This is the reason why targets within gun ranges are often hung up at a certain height to make sure that the safety of the individuals within them is upheld. It is critical that the user does not hang a target that is smaller at the bottom of the one that has already been set up because to do so has the potential of making the individual involved end up aiming at the floor; which is a risky move.

In the gun range, the use of paper targets is often recommended because it enhances the safety of the shooter. Such targets are safe to shoot because the bullets pass through directly without going in unpredictable directions. It also does not create any fragments and leaves very little trash behind; ensuring easier maintenance of the range. Among the most important aspects of operating within a range is that it should involve the use of eye and ear protection to prevent any injuries due to flying fragments or extremely loud noise that has the potential of causing permanent hearing problems.

Gun ranges are among the most interesting places to be because they help individuals enhance their shooting skills. Furthermore they are pertinent to the development of means through which individuals can safely handle their firearms without posing a danger to others around them. It is therefore critical that those individuals who make use of gun ranges follow the rules that have been set for them because it ensures that they are not only able to keep themselves and others safe, but also learn more about their responsibility as gun owners.

Saturday, February 13, 2021

Catalonian Secession Movement

 

In recent years, the politics of Catalonia, a region in Spain, has experienced a rise in a political alliance among the regional parties that seek independence. A number of factors have led to this development, with most of them taking place at the national level of Spain. The first of these was the economic crisis of 2008[1], which was a blow to the economy of Spain, and from which it is in the process of recovering. Also, there was the rise of numerous corruption cases of top government official at both the regional and national levels of government, as well as a failure to achieve a bipartisan agreement that would have reformed the statute of autonomy in 2006.[2] It is also essential to consider that the Spanish constitution of 1978 had a federalist design that was unsatisfactory to the political elite of Catalonia. A consequence of this situation, as well as the rise of Catalonian nationalism, has been that it has brought about louder calls for independence. In this paper, there will be an analysis of the attempts by the Catalonian government to secede from Spain, and to show that despite some legitimate issues that it has raised, Catalonia does not have the right to secede.

A unified Spain, rather than a divided one, is a critical part of the security, both political and economic, of not only the EU, but also the whole world. The secessionist movement in Catalonia is one that has essentially sought to ensure that there is a split from Spain in order to form its own nation. This is a region that has had a long history of autonomy within the kingdom of Aragon. Furthermore, despite their claims of difference, Catalans speak a language that is quite similar to Spanish.[3] The emphasis on differences can be considered fraudulent on the part of the political class in Catalonia that has essentially come to the realization that it is likely to gain more power within an independent state rather than as a part of Spain. The exercise of the right to secede is one that should be conducted under circumstances where it is a part of the highest moral principles, in such a way that other parties are not to interfere with the process.[4] This is an extremely important factor because it shows that the Catalonian independence bid is one that is technically at odds with the morality of secession. Spain is an interested party to the process, and Catalonia cannot secede without Spain’s permission because to do so would essentially lead to a process of taking away a part of the latter country.

The Spanish Constitution of 1978 is one that was ratified by a majority of Catalonians. This constitution allowed for the achievement of considerable autonomy for the region. Furthermore, the Spanish Constitution, which the Catalans ratified, does not agree to any form of secession, because to do so would lead to the disruption of national integrity.[5] However, despite this being the case, it is noteworthy to consider that the Spanish government has not often made it easy for Catalans to feel like an integral part of the country. This is unlike in Canada, where despite the French Canadians being a minority, there have been a number of prime ministers from this community, which has made them feel like an integral part of Canada. The same cannot be said of Spain, where there has been no Catalan prime minister; a situation that has exacerbated some members of the community and intensified calls for self-determination through secession. Perhaps if the Catalans had been provided with a greater say in national affairs, there would have been fewer calls for independence. It is also necessary to consider that there have also been fights between the national government and the regional Catalonian one over such issues as language instruction, spending, and taxes, among others, which have further made the problem worse.

It is essential to consider that the Catalan independence movement is based on the ethnic identity of people of Catalan origins. A consequence has been that this movement has been accused of being one that promotes elitism in Catalonia, where there is little consideration for Spanish speaking peoples living in the region. The independence movement is one that essentially only considers the rights of ethnic Catalans above those of all others living in the region. Because of this, the movement is illegitimate because the Catalan government has been given not only autonomy, but also considerable control over its own internal affairs, such as in taxation. The Catalan politicians cannot say that they are escaping discriminatory distribution of resources[6], because Catalonia is one of the most economically stable regions within Spain. However, despite this being the case, there are still calls for independence, which shows that there are ulterior motives within the political class. There is likely a bid to ensure that they gain more power than is the case as part of Spain, in such a way that rather than representing the people of Catalonia as a whole, they are seeking to bring about a split from Spain that will ensure their political dominance based on an ethnic Catalan majority.

The secession of Catalonia from Spain has the potential of causing numerous disruptions. This is especially the case considering that Catalonia as a state would end up having a very difficult time joining the European Union because Spain, as a member state, has the power to veto this move. The same would be the case with the use of the Euro, which would make many of the multinationals doing business in Catalonia to relocate to other parts of Spain, where conditions are more favorable. It is therefore essential to view the harsh response that the secessionist movement has received from Spain from the perspective of the latter seeking to protect the legitimate expectations of most of its citizens.[7] The secession of a region could as well be opening a Pandora’s box, which would result in a situation where other regions of Spain would also demand independence. Furthermore, there is the potential that it would have a domino effect in other parts of Europe, such as the independence movements in Scotland, and in Scania, Sweden, where there are also calls, albeit quieter, for independence. Therefore, it is unlikely that Spain will allow for the independence of Catalonia anytime soon because to do so has the potential of bringing an end to its unity as a nation.

In conclusion, the Catalan secession bid has the potential of ending up leading to the generation of animosity towards regional autonomies in the Spanish public. In the discussion above, there has been an analysis of the attempts by the Catalonian government to secede from Spain, and this has ended up showing that despite some legitimate issues that it has raised, Catalonia does not have the right to secede. Secession is a problem that has to be dealt with quite carefully by the Catalan political class because it involves a situation where there are numerous potential problems that might arise because of it. Even if the bid is successful, it is essential to consider that the new nation will have many difficulties, including in joining such critical institutions as the EU and NATO, which it currently is a part of, and are presently taken for granted. Spain’s harsh response to this crisis can be considered to be a means of making sure that there is the promotion of its legitimate interests while upholding the expectations of all the people of Spain.



[1] Kathryn Crameri, "Political Power and Civil Counterpower: The Complex Dynamics of the Catalan Independence Movement," Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 21, no. 1 (2015): 104.

[2] Robert Liñeira and Daniel Cetrà, "The Independence Case in Comparative Perspective," The Political Quarterly 86, no. 2 (2015): 263.

[3] Liesl Drew, "'I'm from Barcelona': Boundaries and Transformations between Catalan and Spanish Identities," (Uppsala University, 2017), 22.

[4] Allen Buchanan, Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec (Boulder, CO, San Francisco, CA, Oxford: Westview Press, 1991), 27.

[5] Carmen Gonzalez, "The Catalan National Identity and Catalonia's Bid for Independence," Conn. J. Int'l L. 32 (2016): 115.

[6] Buchanan, 38.

[7] Ibid., 87.